Consulting Firms vs. Crowdsourcing Platforms

When Crowds Beat Professionals?

For any founder and CEO, there comes a time when the company is ready to expand beyond its home market and go international.

Large multinational corporations pay millions to the world’s biggest consulting companies to scout the globe for opportunities and develop a new market-expansion strategy.

Smaller companies do not have that kind of money. But maybe they do not need to.

In fact, there may be another option that is not only cheaper but much more effective: international business consulting crowdsourcing platforms.

We know that Wikipedia has essentially killed the Encyclopedia Britannica.

For more than 250 years, the Encyclopedia Britannica reigned supreme. It took Wikipedia, written by a crowd of unpaid volunteers, only a few years to put Britannica out of business.

Can crowdsourcing platforms do to the consulting industry what Wikipedia did to the encyclopedia business? What Uber did to taxi companies? What Airbnb did to the hotel industry?

Can thousands of business students scattered around the world beat McKinsey and Deloitte at conducting global market research and developing a market entry strategy?

Obviously, for some tasks you always need an expert. If you want to design a nuclear reactor, you need a smart nuclear physicist, not a global crowd of physics hobbyists. Likewise, if you need to conduct a financial audit of a large company, you need an experienced auditor, not a global crowd of accounting and finance students.

But some tasks are uniquely suited to completion by large crowds. So much so that a large crowd of semi-professionals can beat professional consultants every time.

Let’s take a closer look at what crowdsourcing platforms are and what kinds of tasks they can perform better than traditional consultants.

 

From “The Madness of Crowds” to the “Wisdom of Crowds”

In 1841, Charles Mackay published his widely popular book Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. The main message was simple: crowds are bad at making decisions. Mackay supported this argument with numerous examples of crowds being remarkably wrong, from the tulip mania of the 17th century to the Ponzi schemes of the 20th century, as well as riots, cults, and wars fueled by the masses.

However, in contrast to Mackay’s notion of the “madness of crowds,” more recent work has highlighted the ability of crowds to make surprisingly accurate and innovative decisions. This shift was captured in the groundbreaking The Wisdom of Crowds by Surowiecki (2005), followed by Howe’s Crowdsourcing (2008), Libert, Spector, and Tapscott’s We Are Smarter Than Me (2007), Tapscott and Williams’s Wikinomics (2008), and Shirky’s Cognitive Surplus (2010).

The early success of crowdsourcing platforms was staggering.

YouTube crowdsourced video production and fundamentally disrupted traditional television.

Apple did not defeat Nokia simply because the iPhone had a touchscreen, but because Nokia’s programmers could not compete with Apple’s App Store, where thousands of independent developers created millions of apps.

Prediction markets, where large crowds of amateurs bet on economic and political outcomes, consistently produce forecasts that are more accurate than those of professional industry analysts.

For millennia, people could work only in relatively small groups. A tribe might include 100 people. Even a large army rarely exceeded 10,000. The scale of collaboration was limited by geography, communication, and coordination.

However, with the rise of the Internet, those limits have largely disappeared. Today, we can bring hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of people together to work on the same project. Nearly a million contributors have helped build Wikipedia, and hundreds of millions of users generate content on platforms like YouTube.

Everything suggested that large global crowds could be wiser than experts.

 

Consulting Firms vs. Crowdsourcing Platforms

To understand when crowds can outperform consultants, it helps to compare how the two models work.

Traditional consulting firms rely on small, tightly organized teams. The group size is limited. The consultants usually come from similar educational and professional backgrounds. The boundaries of the team are clearly defined. Everyone knows who is in and who is out.

Crowdsourcing platforms are the opposite. The group is large, often massive. The crowd is diverse, spanning different countries, industries, and perspectives. The boundaries are much less clear. Participation is open, and the platform often cannot fully control who joins or how long they stay involved.

Consulting teams interact directly. They meet constantly, coordinate closely, and share information internally. But their work is also secretive. Consulting is built around confidentiality, NDAs, and limited information sharing.

Crowdsourcing is built around openness. Problems are broadcast widely. Information is shared publicly within the crowd. People learn from one another’s ideas, build on each other’s work, and contribute in parallel.

Motivation also differs sharply. Consultants are primarily motivated by extrinsic factors. It is their job. They are paid well, held accountable, and expected to deliver. Their motivation is typically high, but it is driven by professional obligation.

Crowd participants are often motivated intrinsically. They contribute because it is interesting, enjoyable, meaningful, or socially engaging. The motivation can be uneven. Some participants invest little effort, while others become deeply involved.

Pay is another major distinction.

Consultants are guaranteed compensation regardless of the outcome. Crowd contributors are often unpaid or rewarded only if they produce a winning solution.

Consultants work full-time. Crowds contribute occasionally, often in short bursts.

Consultants are expected to understand the entire project and maintain the big picture throughout. Crowd members often do not see the full picture. They may focus on one piece of the problem, one market, or one idea.

Finally, expertise differs. Consultants tend to have deep expertise in a narrow domain. They know everything about a particular area.

Crowds tend to have broad but distributed expertise. Each individual may know only a little, but collectively the crowd knows a lot about almost everything.

These differences explain why consulting firms excel at certain tasks, while crowdsourcing platforms can dominate others, especially when the challenge requires global reach, diverse perspectives, and massive parallel effort.

 

When are crowds particularly effective?

The global crowd’s main asset is size and reach.

2 heads are better than 1. But 2,000 heads are better than 1.

Crowds excel when scale and diversity of ideas, knowledge, and connections matter more than narrow expert depth.

There are four situations in which crowdsourcing platforms are particularly effective and can easily outperform professional consultants.

When are crowds particularly effective?

The global crowd’s main asset is size. Two heads are better than one. But 2,000 heads are better than two.

Crowds excel when scale and diversity of ideas, knowledge, and connections matter more than narrow expert depth.

There are four situations in which crowdsourcing platforms are particularly effective and can easily outperform professional consultants.

 

1. Compilations: Thousands of Small Contributions

Some problems do not require brilliance. They require volume.

A large crowd can always do more than even the most hard-working single expert.

Wikipedia is the classic example. Contributors each write one article, or even just fix one sentence, add one fact, or correct one error. But together, they produce millions of articles, update them in real time, and create a product that even a hundred experts at Encyclopedia Britannica could never match.

Galaxy Zoo applies the same principle in astronomy. It began when a PhD student spent months classifying images of galaxies for his dissertation, but could process only a tiny fraction of the data. When the task was opened to the public, thousands of volunteers joined in. Although each person classified only a few images, the crowd quickly classified millions of galaxies and made unexpected discoveries. What would have taken professional astronomers years became possible in a matter of months.

eBird does something similar for ecology. Birdwatchers around the world report sightings, creating a global database of bird populations and migration patterns. This kind of enormous dataset would be nearly impossible to build through traditional field research, even with large funding.

Linux is another example. Thousands of programmers contribute pieces of code, creating an operating system that now powers much of the world’s digital infrastructure.

 

2. Averages: DemoCrowds

Crowds excel when the goal is to make the most accurate prediction or decision.

The simplest example is the classic party game: Guess how many jelly beans are in a jar. Usually, no one person can guess perfectly, but the crowd’s average is always remarkably close to the true number.

The same logic explains why “Ask the Audience” on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire is more accurate than “Call a Friend.” The audience is correct 92% of the time, while an expert friend is correct only 67% of the time.

Prediction markets, such as the betting website Polymarket, scale this idea to a much larger scale. Millions of people bet on political and economic outcomes. Again and again, prediction markets make more accurate forecasts than professional analysts.

One of the most striking examples comes from the Challenger space shuttle disaster. It took official investigators almost a year to confirm the cause of the explosion: rubber O-rings that had become brittle in cold temperatures and started leaking fuel.

But the stock market, which is essentially a DemoCrowd where millions of traders vote by buying and selling stocks, identified the likely culprit within minutes. The stock prices of manufacturers of various space shuttle components declined immediately after the explosion, but quickly rebounded. For all but one: Morton Thiokol, the manufacturer of the failed O-rings, dropped so sharply that the trading had to be stopped for the day.

 

3. Serendipity: Accidental Gems

Most members of crowdsourcing platforms are not necessarily geniuses. Most ideas shared by the crowd members are at best average, and many are genuinely bad.

But some are very, very good.

If the crowd is large enough, often by accident, somebody will stumble upon something extraordinary.

It’s like sending a million ants in all directions: if somebody dropped a candy, one of them is bound to accidentally stumble upon it.

Even if 99 out of 100 are not good, there is always one who, often accidentally, comes up with a brilliant product name, a catchy marketing slogan, or an unexpected business model insight.

There is always someone who, serendipitously, happens to know someone who can be your distributor, retailer, or buyer in a foreign market.

Crowdsourcing does not succeed because everyone is brilliant. It succeeds because of that one lucky idea or connection.

 

4. Global Expertise Locally

Finally, in international business, crowdsourcing has a unique advantage that professional consulting firms cannot replicate: boots on the ground globally.

A consulting team in Boston or London, no matter how knowledgeable, cannot truly know customers’ tastes, cultures, languages, or regulations in every country.

But a large global crowd can.

If your brand name sounds offensive in another language, if your packaging colors send the wrong cultural signal, or if your business model will not work in a particular country, locals in the global crowd will spot it immediately.

If you need to identify local competitors, find distributors or joint-venture partners, conduct interviews, or run focus groups, a globally dispersed crowd will always be better positioned than consultants based at headquarters thousands of miles away.

Professional consultants provide expertise from the outside. Global crowds provide expertise from the inside. Boots on the ground beat big heads in the central office.

 

The X-Culture Global Business Platform

X-Culture is a unique global platform for international business consulting.

Since its launch in 2010, more than 150,000 MBA and business students from over 500 universities in 90 countries across six continents have completed consulting projects on the
X-Culture platform, helping more than 150 client companies expand into new markets.

Twice a year, a new cohort of about 7,000 business students from over 70 countries participates in X-Culture. They conduct global market research, identify new opportunities, identify potential business partners and customers, and develop actionable market-entry strategies.

Each client company receives tens of thousands of combined work.

Many students produce work of such high quality that client companies hire them upon completion of each project.

Here are the types of tasks our partner companies most commonly ask X-Culture teams to address:

1. Competition and Industry Analysis
   In-depth analysis of key competitors, their business models, product offerings, and pricing strategies, and your company’s strengths and weaknesses.
   Interview your potential customers, distributors, and retailers to gather firsthand insights into how they select their suppliers or vendors; who makes procurement decisions in their organization; their awareness of your company and products; what factors would convince them to switch to your company; etc.

2. Identify New Promising Markets
   Analyze economic conditions, consumer tastes, competition, and regulatory factors in various markets to identify new market growth opportunities.
3. Market Entry Strategy
   Optimal market entry mode and search for local partners, retailers, and distributors.
4. Pricing Strategy
   Pricing strategy that maximizes profitability in the proposed market, including determining the optimal price point and pricing model.
5. Marketing Strategy
   Best promotion channels to reach the buyers; best messaging, slogans and packaging; design of marketing materials for print and social media.
6. Banking and Finances
   Most efficient ways to collect payments and handle cross-border transactions in the proposed market; banking regulations, transaction fees, currency exchange rates, taxation, and other financial considerations.
7. Certification and legal requirements
   Does your product require certification, and what is the process for obtaining it?
   Legal requirements or cultural considerations related to packaging, labeling, or branding?
8. Human Resources
   If hiring local personnel, such as sales representatives, agents, or managers, is necessary, the best recruitment strategy and compensation structure is to optimize motivation, retention, and cost-effectiveness.
9. Logistics
   The most efficient shipping options, cost, reliability, and delivery time; paperwork and regulatory approvals required for shipment.
10. Trade Regulations
    Import tariffs, customs duties, or other trade restrictions in the target market.

 

Over the years, X-Culture has helped more than 150 companies expand into new markets.

Notable clients include Mercedes-Benz, Louis Vuitton, Hard Rock International, YKK, JCB, Polaris, The Home Depot, and over 100 smaller companies and startups.

 

Download as printable PDF